What
could be more natural for a man than for him to want to see the body of a woman he finds
attractive? What sort of logic lies behind his government trying to prevent him from doing
so? So there is perhaps, a certain irony in the fact that if it hadn't been for the
draconian British obscenity laws, photos like the ones from the fifties and sixties show
on this page might never have been taken. The models concerned were persuaded to shave to
make retouching easier, but retouching wouldn't have been necessary in the first place
without the censorship, so neither would shaving.
Until the very late
sixties, no British publisher could risk showing a girl's pubic hair, let alone an open
leg shot. Things changed rapidly in the seventies and Harrison Marks supplied British
magazines with the type of images in demand as he had always done. |
 |
By
the mid seventies, open leg shots were commonplace in British men's publications, but
pubic hair tended to conceal the finer details. |
 |
In
the second half of the seventies, even more explicit shots were in demand. Open leg was no
longer enough : showing pink was to push the boundaries yet one step further and shaving
returned to stay. |
|

This
Harrison Marks photo was taken in 1960, but it couldn't be published like this until over
fifteen years later. Until then such images remained black market acquisitions.

Another
photograph from the sixties which might have only have revealed a dark bush if it hadn't
have been for the censor.
|